- 1 Once Burned, Twice Shy—Why “Anti-Vaxxers” Are Really “Ex-Vaxxers”
- 2 From compliance to damage
- 3 Cash talks
- 4 Double standards
- 5 Say NO to Obligatory Vaccines T-Shirt
- 6 Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Once Burned, Twice Shy—Why “Anti-Vaxxers” Are Really “Ex-Vaxxers”
By the Youngsters’s Well being Protection Staff
In the 1920s, Edward Bernays, the so-called “father of public relations,” wrote several influential books outlining the rules of successful propaganda.
In his guide by that title, Bernays argued that “the mind of the people…is made up for it by…those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion” and know learn how to skillfully provide the public with “inherited prejudices” and “verbal formulas.”
Bernays’ comments come to thoughts within the current climate of hostility and intolerance being directed towards individuals pejoratively dubbed by the vaccine lobby as “anti-vaxxers.”
The dumbed-down propaganda being plastered throughout the mainstream media on an virtually every day basis would have the public consider that anyone who questions any facet of vaccination is ignorant, selfish or both.
Nevertheless, there is a obvious flaw with this logic. The undeniable fact—which the legislators, regulators, reporters and residents who’re collaborating in mass tarring and feathering usually are not trustworthy sufficient to admit—is that most of the individuals categorised as “anti-vaxxers” are actually “ex-vaxxers” whose dutiful adherence to present vaccine policies led to critical vaccine damage in themselves or a beloved one.
From compliance to damage
Vaccine protection in america is high. Of their first three years, over 99% of American youngsters receive some vaccines.
By the government’s indirect admission, nevertheless, vaccine-related opposed events are also widespread—with fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries ever getting reported.
Parental compliance with the Facilities for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) heavy-duty vaccine necessities for infants is usually the catalyst for the accidents that begin households down the path of turning into “ex-vaxxers.”
In a single tragic case, a dad or mum who followed docs’ orders misplaced her six-week-old toddler woman 12 hours after the child acquired eight vaccines; medical specialists’ conclusion that vaccination was the cause of dying prompted a unique valuation of dangers and benefits with a subsequent baby.
There are lots of other such tales. Furthermore, when individuals that suffer nonfatal vaccine injuries keep on with the standard vaccination routine, research exhibits that they typically experience even more extreme accidents the subsequent time around.
Within the U.S., vaccines have been liability-free since 1986—and evidence suggests that vaccine security has deteriorated considerably in consequence.
The one present recourse for the vaccine-injured is to file a petition with the stingy and slow-moving Nationwide Vaccine Damage Compensation Program (NVICP).
Although the NVICP has paid out over $4 billion in taxpayer-funded compensation, it denies much more petitions than it awards.
The household of the six-week-old described within the previous paragraph ultimately acquired NVICP compensation, however not before the program expended appreciable effort to go away the reason for demise unexplained.
And, literally adding insult to damage, the maximum payout for any vaccine-related dying is just $250,000.
When individuals or their loved ones are vaccine-injured, many begin to unravel the unscrupulous world of pharmaceutical influence on our media, authorities company leaders and lawmakers.
Connecting the dots is a horrifying and enlightening experience, exposing information to which most of the people usually stays oblivious. These revelations weigh heavily when somebody makes the choice to permanently become an “ex-vaxxer.”
Why would the individuals’s elected representatives (and the officials they appoint) propagate smears, promote censorship and ignore the testimonials of the various families which have skilled devastating vaccine accidents?
Why would officialdom ignore the escalating fiscal implications of vaccine injuries, that are imposing a staggering financial burden on households and taxpayers?
Why do the media increasingly advocate for the elimination of knowledgeable consent and vaccine selection?
One of many inescapable solutions has to do with the overt and covert affect of pharmaceutical business funding on those who shape vaccine policy and public opinion.
At the authorities degree, senior Senators brazenly admit that “drug companies have too much influence in Washington,” with massive pharma spending greater than another business on lobbying and campaign contributions.
For instance, the pharmaceutical business poured an estimated $100 million into the 2016 elections, rewarding politicians on each side of the aisle with its largesse.
The chair of a Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) committee has said, “Congress is getting paid to not hold pharma accountable” [emphasis added].
Not content to only affect legislators, the pharmaceutical business puts equally high value on print advertising directed at docs—the all-important “gatekeepers” between drug corporations and patients.
The truth is, studies present that medical journal promoting generates “the highest return on investment of all promotional strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies.”
Masking all bases, pharmaceutical corporations additionally promote vaccines and other medicine directly to U.S. shoppers.
The U.S. is one in every of only two nations on the earth (together with New Zealand) that permits one of these direct-to-consumer pandering.
Drug company spending on television and print promoting in the U.S. rose to $5.2 billion in 2016—a 60% improve over 2012—with untold further amounts spent on digital and social media advertising.
Astoundingly, pharmaceutical corporations even get a tax break for these advertising expenditures, a company deduction that costs taxpayers billions yearly.
The media benefit handsomely from the steady infusion of pharma promoting dollars. Four networks (CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox) acquired two-thirds of the TV ad monies spent on top-selling medicine in 2015, with the Prevnar 13 vaccine representing the eighth most-advertised pharmaceutical product that yr.
Beneath these bought-media circumstances, it is somewhat astonishing that a number of media retailers have been prepared to concede that drug money “coursing through the veins of Congress” instantly contributed to the opioid crisis.
Thus far, nevertheless, no reporters have been prepared to connect comparable dots between drug cash and unsafe vaccines.
Pharmaceutical business affect makes itself felt not simply domestically but in addition globally, and this has led to a corresponding amping-up of rhetoric towards “anti-vaxxers” around the globe.
In early 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) hyperbolically declared “reluctance or refusal to vaccinate” to be one in every of ten main “global health threats.”
What the WHO failed to mention, nevertheless, is the preponderant position of “commercial interests”—and particularly pharmaceutical business interests—in shaping its objectives and methods.
Back in 2009, sleight of hand by WHO scientists rebranded the swine flu from “a ‘perfectly ordinary flu’” into a “dangerous pandemic.”
This maneuver successfully generated billions in income for vaccine and anti-flu drug manufacturers; nevertheless, the vaccine in query (Pandemrix) prompted instances of narcolepsy—many in young individuals—to surge all over Europe to just about four occasions greater than prevaccine ranges. In all probability, the mother and father of the narcolepsy-afflicted youth joined the ranks of “ex-vaxxers.” A researcher wanting back on the Pandemrix fiasco lately said:
“If vaccine regulators were serious about safety, the entire vaccine fleet would have been grounded following the Pandemrix narcolepsy disaster, to check for the same mechanism of failure in other vaccines. But nothing of that sort happened….”
If shoppers need to study concerning the potential dangers of extensively used FDA-approved medicine, they will—with just a little legwork—find detailed info on tons of of medicine on the FDA’s website.
For azithromycin, for example, the FDA hyperlinks to studies displaying that the antibiotic increases risks of most cancers relapse and cardiovascular problems.
A link for fentanyl clearly warns of “the potential for life-threatening harm from accidental exposure” and “deadly” dangers to both youngsters and adults.
Though it can be an uphill battle to get medicine taken off the market, the continued strain of lawsuits has succeeded in eradicating some egregious offenders resembling Vioxx—and Merck, Vioxx’s producer, has been pressured to pay out billions in settlements.
In distinction, shoppers who go to the FDA web site for danger details about vaccines (categorized as “biologics” moderately than “drugs”) will search virtually in useless, finding sparse info for less than 4 vaccines.
One of many 4 is Gardasil—additionally manufactured by Merck, and probably the most notoriously dangerous vaccines ever rushed onto the market.
While the FDA cautiously states that “concerns have been raised about reports of deaths occurring in individuals after receiving Gardasil,” the company asserts that “there was not a common pattern to the deaths that would suggest they were caused by the vaccine.”
The 2018 e-book, The HPV Vaccine on Trial, contradicts this benign narrative and describes how Gardasil has brought about hundreds of perfectly healthy younger men and women to “suddenly lose energy, become wheelchair-bound, or even die” while Merck continues to take pleasure in “soaring revenues.”
For government and the media to dismiss these and different accounts of great vaccine injuries as insignificant—whereas falsely labeling injured individuals and their advocates as irresponsible “anti-vaxxers”—is each shameful and insulting.
After revealing how the mainstream narrative about Gardasil is riddled with “discrepancies and half-truths,” the authors of The HPV Vaccine on Trial issued a call for higher civility.
Noting that marginalization and bullying of the vaccine-injured “destroys civil public discourse and discourages scientific inquiry,” they identified that “we urgently need both.”
Learn the complete article at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
Comment on this text at VaccineImpact.com.
© 2018 Youngsters’s Well being Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Youngsters’s Well being Protection, Inc.
Need to study more from Youngsters’s Health Defense? Join free information and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Youngsters’s Well being Defense. Your donation will help to help them of their efforts.
Leaving a profitable career as a nephrologist (kidney physician), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to truly help remedy individuals.
On this autobiography she explains why good docs are constrained inside the present corrupt medical system from working towards real, moral drugs.
One of the sane voices relating to analyzing the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist docs have ever dared to debate her in public.
E-book – The Vaccine Courtroom, by Wayne Rohde – 240 pages
“The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program”
FREE Delivery Out there!
Say NO to Obligatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Massive Pharma and authorities well being authorities try to cross legal guidelines mandating vaccines for all youngsters, and even adults.
Show your opposition to pressured vaccinations and help the cause of Vaccine Influence, a part of the Health Influence Information network.
Revealed on April 30, 2019